Dr. Omar A. Alsamani/Open Library/Innovation Management العربيةPDF
Back matter

References

The works cited in the chapters of this book, arranged alphabetically according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th edition).

Arabic references

  1. Saudi Vision 2030. (2016). [Saudi Vision 2030 document] [In Arabic]. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa
  2. Alsamani, O. A. (2023). [Needs of creatively and innovatively gifted university students for stimulating creativity and innovation] [In Arabic]. Journal of Human Sciences, University of Hail, 6(19, Pt. 2), 39–62.
  3. Alsamani, O. A. (2026). [The supportive community for innovation and entrepreneurship for gifted individuals as perceived by Saudi innovative entrepreneurs: A qualitative phenomenological study] [In Arabic]. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, Qassim University, 19(2), 621–652.
  4. Personal Data Protection Law. (2021). [Issued by Royal Decree No. (M/19) dated 9/2/1443 AH] [In Arabic]. Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  5. Saudi Data and AI Authority. (2023). [AI ethics principles] (Version 1.0) [In Arabic]. https://sdaia.gov.sa
  6. Saudi Press Agency. (2022, June 30). [His Royal Highness the Crown Prince announces the national aspirations and priorities for the research, development and innovation sector for the next two decades] [In Arabic]. https://www.spa.gov.sa/2366924

English-language references

  1. Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
  2. Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.
  3. Alsamani, O. A. (2019). Fostering creativity and innovation in gifted students through the eyes of gifted education educators [Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado]. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/573/
  4. Alsamani, O. A. (2023). The development of innovation for the creatively gifted: A phenomenological study of the lived experiences of successful outstanding innovators. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 41(1–3), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2023/41.1-3.1279
  5. Alsamani, O. A. (2026). Structured collaboration with generative artificial intelligence to foster innovation and strategic thinking in entrepreneurship education. Discover Education, 5, Article 582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01593-9
  6. Alsamani, O. A., & Alqahtani, Y. A. (2026). Cultivating innovation in higher education: The role of everyday faculty support and creative self-efficacy [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Special Education, University of Hail.
  7. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
  8. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The social psychology of creativity." Westview Press.
  9. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87.
  10. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
  11. Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 52–61.
  12. Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
  13. Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003
  14. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–665. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393475
  15. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2013). Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). World Development, 51, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.05.011
  16. Ansoff, H. I. (1975). Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. California Management Review, 18(2), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164635
  17. Anthony, S. D., Viguerie, S. P., Schwartz, E. I., & Van Landeghem, J. (2018). 2018 corporate longevity forecast: Creative destruction is accelerating. Innosight.
  18. Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., & Manso, G. (2011). Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. The RAND Journal of Economics, 42(3), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.x
  19. Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102–1119. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0470
  20. Baghai, M., Coley, S., & White, D. (1999). The alchemy of growth: Practical insights for building the enduring enterprise. Perseus Books.
  21. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  22. Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599
  23. Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2), 27.
  24. Berg, J. M. (2016). Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 433–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216642211
  25. Bland, D. J., & Osterwalder, A. (2019). Testing business ideas: A field guide for rapid experimentation. Wiley.
  26. Blank, S. (2019, October). Why companies do "innovation theater" instead of actual innovation. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/10/why-companies-do-innovation-theater-instead-of-actual-innovation
  27. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
  28. Boehm, B. W. (1981). Software engineering economics. Prentice-Hall.
  29. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
  30. Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 809–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027652
  31. Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X
  32. Camuffo, A., Cordova, A., Gambardella, A., & Spina, C. (2020). A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Science, 66(2), 564–586. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3249
  33. Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2012). Build, borrow, or buy: Solving the growth dilemma. Harvard Business Review Press.
  34. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
  35. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
  36. Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford University Press.
  37. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.529
  38. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
  39. Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016). Know your customers' "jobs to be done." Harvard Business Review, 94(9), 54–62.
  40. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Pergamon.
  41. Clark, K. B., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1992). Organizing and leading "heavyweight" development teams. California Management Review, 34(3), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41167421
  42. Cohen, A. R., & Bradford, D. L. (2005). Influence without authority (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  43. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  44. Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. Frances Pinter.
  45. Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I
  46. Cooper, R. G. (2014). What's next? After stage-gate. Research-Technology Management, 57(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5606963
  47. Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Portfolio management for new product development: Results of an industry practices study. R&D Management, 31(4), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00225
  48. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406
  49. Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
  50. Dell'Acqua, F., Ayoubi, C., Lifshitz, H., Sadun, R., Mollick, E., Mollick, L., Han, Y., Goldman, J., Nair, H., Taub, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2026). The cybernetic teammate: A field experiment on generative AI and teamwork. Organization Science, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.20702
  51. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
  52. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
  53. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  54. Doshi, A. R., & Hauser, O. P. (2024). Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances, 10(28), Article eadn5290. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290
  55. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row.
  56. Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 397–428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.9309035145
  57. Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 716–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069412
  58. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  59. Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48–55.
  60. Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley.
  61. Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414845
  62. Ellram, L. M. (1995). Total cost of ownership: An analysis approach for purchasing. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25(8), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039510099928
  63. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  64. European Commission, & OECD. (2012). A guiding framework for entrepreneurial universities. OECD.
  65. Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
  66. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
  67. Fernandez, R., & Swart, W. (2025). The new ISO 56000 family of standards for innovation management. Standards, 5(4), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/standards5040034
  68. Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409
  69. Flyvbjerg, B., & Gardner, D. (2023). How big things get done: The surprising factors that determine the fate of every project, from home renovations to space exploration and everything in between. Currency.
  70. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
  71. Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., & Csik, M. (2014). The business model navigator: 55 models that will revolutionise your business. Pearson.
  72. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. Wiley.
  73. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
  74. Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56(4), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144
  75. Gompers, P. A. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1461–1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05185.x
  76. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
  77. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
  78. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Pearson.
  79. Hansen, M. T. (2009). Collaboration: How leaders avoid the traps, create unity, and reap big results. Harvard Business Press.
  80. Hauser, J., & Katz, G. (1998). Metrics: You are what you measure! European Management Journal, 16(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(98)00029-2
  81. Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B., & Torgerson, D. (2012). Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials. Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team.
  82. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
  83. HM Treasury. (2022). The green book: Central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-government
  84. Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do prototypes prototype? In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 367–381). Elsevier.
  85. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393393
  86. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
  87. International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Innovation management — Innovation management assessment — Guidance (ISO/TR 56004:2019). https://www.iso.org/standard/72989.html
  88. International Organization for Standardization. (2024). Innovation management system — Requirements (ISO Standard No. 56001:2024). https://www.iso.org/standard/79278.html
  89. International Organization for Standardization. (2025). Innovation management — Fundamentals and vocabulary (ISO Standard No. 56000:2025). https://www.iso.org/standard/84436.html
  90. Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
  91. Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0491
  92. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59.
  93. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
  94. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x
  95. Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.5465/255378
  96. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1997). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 65–75.
  97. Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
  98. Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. (2005). Innovation implementation: Overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00373.x
  99. Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071863
  100. Koh, D., Lee, K., & Joshi, K. (2019). Transformational leadership and creativity: A meta-analytic review and identification of an integrated model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(6), 625–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2355
  101. Kohavi, R., & Thomke, S. (2017). The surprising power of online experiments. Harvard Business Review, 95(5), 74–82.
  102. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  103. Lafley, A. G., & Martin, R. L. (2013). Playing to win: How strategy really works. Harvard Business Review Press.
  104. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  105. Lee, A., Lyubovnikova, J., Tian, A. W., & Knight, C. (2020). Servant leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12265
  106. Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review, 96(5), 72–79.
  107. List, J. A. (2022). The voltage effect: How to make good ideas great and great ideas scale. Currency.
  108. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter.
  109. Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823–1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x
  110. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  111. McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580438
  112. McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1995). Discovery-driven planning. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 44–54.
  113. Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894–904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615
  114. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
  115. Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
  116. Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018
  117. Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.
  118. Nagji, B., & Tuff, G. (2012). Managing your innovation portfolio. Harvard Business Review, 90(5), 66–74.
  119. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
  120. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342
  121. O'Connor, G. C., & DeMartino, R. (2006). Organizing for radical innovation: An exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large established firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00219.x
  122. OECD. (2017). Skills for a high performing civil service. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264280724-en
  123. OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on artificial intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449; amended 2024). https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
  124. OECD. (2021). Micro-credential innovations in higher education: Who, what and why? (OECD Education Policy Perspectives No. 39). https://doi.org/10.1787/f14ef041-en
  125. OECD. (2022). Tackling policy challenges through public sector innovation: A strategic portfolio approach. https://doi.org/10.1787/052b06b7-en
  126. OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
  127. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
  128. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
  129. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. Scribner.
  130. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley.
  131. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  132. Pisano, G. P. (2015). You need an innovation strategy. Harvard Business Review, 93(6), 44–54.
  133. Pisano, G. P. (2019). The hard truth about innovative cultures. Harvard Business Review, 97(1), 62–71.
  134. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
  135. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
  136. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business.
  137. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
  138. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  139. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  140. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  141. Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.
  142. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development (R. Opie, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
  143. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2
  144. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
  145. Sull, D., Homkes, R., & Sull, C. (2015). Why strategy execution unravels—and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review, 93(3), 58–67.
  146. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers.
  147. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  148. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
  149. Thomke, S., & Fujimoto, T. (2000). The effect of "front-loading" problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1720128
  150. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2021). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (7th ed.). Wiley.
  151. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
  152. Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939
  153. Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D., & Yang, M. C. (2020). Product design and development (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  154. Ulwick, A. W. (2002). Turn customer input into innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 91–97.
  155. van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
  156. von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791
  157. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide.
  158. Wedell-Wedellsborg, T. (2017). Are you solving the right problems? Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 76–83.
  159. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
  160. Wiltsey Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: A review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science, 7, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-17
  161. World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
  162. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). Saudi Arabia ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2025. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/gii-ranking/2025/sa.pdf
  163. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2026). Saudi Arabia ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2026. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/gii-ranking/2026/sa.pdf
  164. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099